- Messages
- 2,929
A lot of people tend to argue on forums over if size is more geared towards care or genetics. now granted a dragon with poor husbandry can and most likely will be stunted. But if you take two dragons from very different bloodlines and gave them the exact same care (lighting, food, supplements, Etc) what would the difference be. Well as most of you know i bred Dr. Evil (my gg tiger) to bella (patternless blood). Both animals are on the large end of the spectrum for american beardies. Dr. evil being at just over 22 inches and bella being 19.5 with a tail nip. Their babies grew very fast. By 2 months the citrus tiger male i still have was 10.5 inches and 55-60 grams (just hit 3 months 12.5 inches 90 grams). now you take the baby i got from Koral. I got her having already been bred by a friend of mine. The sire was a quad het italian leather back and she is a cawley red Ogg (so both of the babies had German Giant in their lineage). The baby from this pairing grew at a noticably different rate. He is currently 2 months old(well will be tomorrow) and is significantly smaller than the citrus tiger was at 2 months. 7-7.5 inches and about 25 grams in weight. These dragons were both kept under MVB lighting, fed nymph dubia, turks, crickets, small supers, and collards. both were given calcium and vitamin supplements and both are 100% healthy. The bloodline apparently dictated their growth. I just found it interesting specifically because of how many arguments i have seen in the past over growth and how its due to the owner that dragons grow or dont grow at a certain rate.